Social

Rumors: factors and functions

Image: Pixabay.com

Rumour comes from Latin rumor, meaning hubbub of voices. Today rumors are defined as propositions or beliefs that are transmitted orally as true, without sufficient evidence, to be demonstrated. It is a very typical form of communication in collective behavior.

Factors influencing the rumors.

According to the theory of Rosnow (1991) rumors circulating according to three factors: general uncertainty, rumor credibility and anxiety it produces.

1. General Uncertainty. It has reference to the ambiguity socially distributed around a theme. According to experiments Rosnow is transmitted up to 78% more than a rumor in a situation of low cognitive clarity. In a situation of chaos, like a natural disaster, any news is true or not broadcast more times as it is a way to resolve the tension.

2. Credibility and certainty to the rumor. It is the degree of confidence generated in its veracity. To validate the emotions and attitudes generally around him whether positive or negative people try to think that the rumor always has some truth. Recall the famous sociological experiment rumor artificially generated with Ricky Martin, a dog, jam … I think it does not go into details. A very large percentage of the population gave credence only to the expectations generated.

3. Personal Anxiety. Anxiety is an emotion that is generated to a potential threat. Thus, not only just made it a low cognitive clarity but is a way to express the emotional strains of anxiogenic type. To understand say an example the case of bird flu a few years ago, a certain population caused him anxiety being able to get the disease and this makes it easier to give credibility and transmit it to avoid infection.

Other important for the transmission of rumors factors are the degree of importance, ie the level of reward or punishment that could lead to believe the rumor; and on the other hand the social impact, ie, the number of people who would be affected or the time that has been repeated.

Functions of the rumors.

According to several authors (Allport and Postman, 1982; Rouquette, 1997) rumors functions are as follows:

  • Cathartic function: to express our anxiety by the fact, anger or other attitude that emotion is discharged.
  • Justification: socially it serves to validate an emotion.
  • Effort explanation: the attribute a meaning to a fact fulfills a function of knowledge. That is, it is better to think we know something that we are ignorant of the subject.
  • Pragmatic: as an extension to the explanation justifies collectively Example: Say that of “He knows the whole neighborhood.”
  • Excitation aesthetic: a rumor breaks the daily routine and transmits a new information that produces a dramatic effect. For example, when sometimes the death of another person communicates although certainly not know.

For social psychology rumors are one of the most studied on the behavior of masses and in this article we have summarized very briefly phenomena.

__

References

Allport, G. W., y Postman, L (1947/1982): Psicología del Rumor, Buenos Aires, Editorial Psique. 

Rosnow, R.L. (1991): Inside Rumor. A personal Journey. American Psychologist, 46, pp484-496.

 

Sobre el autor

Iván Pico

Graduado en Psicología (UNED). Nº Colegiado G-5480. Diplomado en Ciencias Empresariales (USC). Máster en Psicología del Trabajo y las Organizaciones. (INESEM). Máster Universitario Oficial en Orientación Profesional (UNED). Posgrado en Neuromarketing (Universidad Camilo José Cela). Técnico Deportivo Nivel II, fútbol sala (RFEF). Especialista en Psicología Aplicada al Deporte. Etc, etc...
Ver Página personal de Linkedin para información adicional o en la sección ¿Quién soy de la web? :)

Comentar

Click aquí para dejar un comentario

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.